[Firestarter]

You may be interested in this you may not. I just get a little peeved when Christian teachings are compared with Satanic fabrications.

I don't want to offend you but the New Testament was written by the "scribes and pharizees" that Joshua of Nazareth despised so much (Jesus wasn't even his name!).
If you want to follow Joshua's teachings you won't learn it from going to your Church listening to some false preacher, who probably doesn't even have a clue about what Joshua stood up for in the first place (that got him executed by the Romans that ruled what is now called Israel)...

Yes you are correct a great percentage of religious worship is of pagan origin, that is because it's author is Satan. The Satanic version of the bible is written backwards because it is an alternative version of truth.

The official story is that all of the books of the New Testament were written in the 1st century AD...

How could Emperor Constantine discover these scriptures as Emperor Diocletianon in 23 February 303, in the edict of Diocletian, ordered the destruction of all the scriptures of the followers of Joshua of Nazareth (were they already called Christians)?
Do we have to believe that these “Christians” trusted the Mithras, sun worshipping Emperor Constantine; and that they turned over their guarded holy texts only a couple of years after many of them were executed for not turning them in!

A few years later, Roman Emperor Constantine enlisted the help of Eusebius, to create 50 copies of the entire Bible.
So these could only have been texts that were written by the Roman slavedrivers: http://www.bible.ca/b-canon-diocletians-...ipture.htm


In the 8th century, the story was that Roman Emperor Constantine the Great converted to Christianity after he had been cured of leprosy.

In the 21th century, our wonderful history falsifiers think that it’s wise, as Constantine didn’t suffer from leprosy, to push another story...
This story now reads, that in 312 Constantine was commanded in a dream on the eve of the battle to place the sign of Christ on the shields of his soldiers. So in one of those strange coincidences he chose the sign of Mithras – the cross?!?

Arius, a priest in Alexandria, taught that there was a time when Christ did not exist, so wasn’t co-eternal with the Father, and that the Son was subordinate to the Father and that the Trinity - Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – are 3 different hypostaseis (if you believe in this "Trinity" you´ve been fooled by the Devil).

Constantine then summoned the First Ecumenical Council of the church at Nicaea that started on 20 May 325. The council formulated the Nicene Creed, including the Trinity and that the Bible is “God’s word”.
St Nicholas of Myra (on who supposedly Sinterklaas and Santa are based) hit Arius in his face to stop him from talking at the First Council of Nicaea: http://homepages.rpi.edu/~holmes/Hobbies...06_195.htm


According to the Roman Satanist that wrote the New Testament in Latin, the young baby Jesus was visited by an unspecified amount of “magi” from the East.
The Latin magi doesn´t mean “wise men” at all but magicians, witches (is there anything more “Satanic” than witches?).

Mithras is always pictured wearing a red Mithras cap...
See a picture of the 3 supposed witches visiting baby Jesus (Balthasar, Melchior and Caspar) wearing the Mithras cap.