• 1(current)
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 7
  • Next 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
covid19 vaccine
#1
Vernon Coleman on last night's show (16th Nov 20) said that the new covid vaccines (particularly the moderna one) would definitely change your DNA, and quoted from a Moderna white paper. I found the white paper he referenced... https://www.modernatx.com/sites/default/...7_v8_4.pdf

Vernon quoted from the section titled "DNA VACCINES" page 3, and it does say under these vaccines that they do affect DNA. BUT, the vaccines just released by Moderna and Pfizer are mRNA and in that section of the white paper it specifically says under the section titled "mRNA Vaccines" .......:

"mRNA vaccines do not need to enter the nucleus, nor do they risk being integrated into our DNA, and they are directly translated into protein antigens."

So I'd like to know specifically what are Vernon's references for saying these vaccines definitely can change your DNA. The BBC release an article saying these new vaccines do not affect DNA. Are the BBC right or is Vernon right? Have I mis-understood what Vernon said???
#2
(11-17-2020, 02:23 PM)remap1 Wrote: Vernon Coleman on last night's show (16th Nov 20) said that the new covid vaccines (particularly the moderna one) would definitely change your DNA, and quoted from a Moderna white paper. I found the white paper he referenced... https://www.modernatx.com/sites/default/...7_v8_4.pdf

Vernon quoted from the section titled "DNA VACCINES" page 3, and it does say under these vaccines that they do affect DNA. BUT, the vaccines just released by Moderna and Pfizer are mRNA and in that section of the white paper it specifically says under the section titled "mRNA Vaccines" .......:

"mRNA vaccines do not need to enter the nucleus, nor do they risk being integrated into our DNA, and they are directly translated into protein antigens."

So I'd like to know specifically what are Vernon's references for saying these vaccines definitely can change your DNA. The BBC release an article saying these new vaccines do not affect DNA. Are the BBC right or is Vernon right? Have I mis-understood what Vernon said???

Richie clarified this on show tonight (17th Nov 20). Vernon has clarified that he made a mistake and the mRNA vaccine does not alter DNA - thanks for finding out Richie!
#3
Pfizer CEO ‘not certain’ their vaccine stops transmission of Covid-19 as company’s jab approved in UK and evaluated in US

The top executive at pharma giant Pfizer said it still isn’t clear if those who receive the company’s vaccine will be able transmit the coronavirus to others, just one day after the UK became the first to approve the inoculation.
While Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said he expects the vaccine rollout to be rapid after it gets the green light from US health officials, following in the steps of Britain, he noted that it remains to be seen whether recipients of the jab can still carry and pass the virus. 
“Even though I’ve had the protection, am I still able to transmit it to other people?” NBC’s Lester Holt asked in an interview on Thursday night, prompting a startling response from Bourla:
I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now.
Last month, Pfizer announced that its vaccine – developed alongside German firm BioNTech – had proven to be more than 90 percent effective in giving immunity to trial participants, getting the green light from UK health authorities on Wednesday to begin distribution for widespread use.
Pfizer has applied for emergency approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but the agency has been more reluctant to pass the immunization, with a top infectious disease expert, Anthony Fauci, saying his UK counterparts “really rushed through that approval” while praising the FDA’s “very careful” authorization process.
While the two pharma firms stand by the effectiveness of their vaccine, an inability to halt transmission from virus carriers could mean the inoculation falls short of the lofty expectations voiced by some officials in the US and UK.

Read more: Pfizer CEO ‘not certain’ their vaccine stops transmission of Covid-19 as company’s jab approved in UK and evaluated in US
#4
The lying BBC: The Pfizer RNA never used before vaccine ‘offers up to 95% protection against Covid-19’ – how do they know? Pfizer said so

The Pfizer/BioNTech coronavirus vaccine has been approved for widespread use in the UK. 
British regulator, the MHRA, says the jab is safe to start being used from next week.
What is the Pfizer vaccine and how does it work?
The vaccine trains the immune system to fight coronavirus.
It is a new type of jab called an RNA vaccine and uses a tiny fragment of the virus’s genetic code. This starts making part of the virus inside the body, which the immune system recognises as foreign and starts to attack.
The genetic material is encased in a tiny protective bubble of fat to get it into cells. 
The exact ingredients of the vaccine have not been made public, but other vaccines can contain other ingredients, like aluminium, to make them stable or more effective. 
The vaccine is given in two doses – three weeks apart – and offers up to 95% protection against Covid-19.
Read more:

 The lying BBC: The Pfizer RNA never used before vaccine ‘offers up to 95% protection against Covid-19’ – how do they know? Pfizer said so
#5
Poll Shows Nearly 6 in 10 Prefer to Wait or Outright Reject Getting ‘Covid’ Vaccine

In perhaps the most in-depth polling on the topic of mRNA vaccines, a new nationwide poll of 1,000 U.S. adults, conducted by John Zogby Strategies, continues to show a large portion of the public has concerns over mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines.
When asked whether they’ll take the first-time mRNA vaccine, a total of 55% prefer to either “wait and see if it negatively affects other people who get it” (39%) or “don’t want to take this new mRNA COVID-19 vaccine” (16%). Thirty percent report they “will take the mRNA vaccine as soon as it is available.”
Looking more closely at those choosing not to get the vaccine: 67% are fearful of side effects. A similar October 2020 poll showed that 59% were afraid of side effects, a growth of 8% points.  In this same group, 39% are concerned because vaccine makers have liability protection.
These numbers show millions of Americans are afraid or uncertain about future effects of this next-generation vaccine,” Pollster Jeremy Zogby said. “How will the CDC and FDA deal with this deeply rooted sentiment? In any event, they’ll have to deal with the reality that fear/hesitancy is intense.”

Read more: Poll Shows Nearly 6 in 10 Prefer to Wait or Outright Reject Getting ‘Covid’ Vaccine
#6
WHO Changes Definition of “Herd Immunity” to Eliminate Pre-COVID Consensus

The World Health Organization has changed the definition of “herd immunity,” eliminating the pre-COVID consensus that it could be achieved by allowing a virus to spread through a population, and insisting that herd immunity comes solely from vaccines.
The change occurred on a section of the WHO’s website entitled ‘Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Serology, antibodies and immunity’.
The WHO’s original definition (archived here) states that herd immunity “happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. This means that even people who haven’t been infected, or in whom an infection hasn’t triggered an immune response, they are protected because people around them who are immune can act as buffers between them and an infected person.”
The original definition fails to identify the pre-COVID consensus on what is meant by “herd immunity,” which is when a population becomes protected against a virus because enough people have been infected with it to create community immunity. 
However, the WHO’s updated version is even more extreme, insisting that herd immunity can only be achieved by mass vaccination programs.
“‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached,” states the WHO website, adding, “Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.”

Read more: WHO Changes Definition of “Herd Immunity” to Eliminate Pre-COVID Consensus
#7
Doctors worldwide warn AGAINST mRNA (covid) vaccine -

This is a public service announcement for humanity. 

Do you understand what a mRNA vaccine is, or what it is designed to do? 

Do you know that courageous Doctors around the world are risking their careers to try to tell you the truth about this dangerous vaccine? 

Do you have loved ones who can't wait to take it? 

This video is for them.

https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/he...d-vaccine/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/y7X9xkankSVh/



REALTED videos I mentioned:


THE BEAST SYSTEM & COVID-1984: CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS & DR. SHERRI TENPENNY


https://www.bitchute.com/video/3sNBdGAIonJw/

EXPOSED: OPERATION WARP SPEED - THE TERRIFYING PLAN TO TRACK & TRACE YOU

https://www.bitchute.com/video/zK1dESROnsyt/
#8
Tagged by the vaccine?

[Image: FullSizeRender.jpg]


Email to Davidicke.com:
Hey Gareth,
A friend of my hubby, a Harvard graduate and Pediatrician, got his “much anticipated“ shot today. He posted his Vaccine Pass on FB, see pic attached. I just blackened his name and b-day. There seems to be a code or serial number to that shot. 
We‘ve heard that from other friends from the US, who work as nurses and doctors, that the syringe has a number attached. Would be a great tool to track people who got the shot. Maybe you guys already know about it or want to dig into it. 
Another thing that popped up in my mind when I heard your Dad talk about for what the test is, and for what definitely not… what if they do gene testing in the name of corona testing to see who is most compatible for their plans? Or to put us in categories of some kind. When you test at the doctors you get registered by name, at least in Germany as your insurance pays for the test. 
Anyways, just a thought!
#9
Fascist Spain to keep list of people who refuse ‘Covid-19’ vaccination & share data with ‘European partners’ (fellow fascists) – health minister

Spain’s health minister said authorities will keep a list of people who decline to get vaccinated and share it with other European countries. The data will be protected and not publicly available, he said.
“We will have a registry… of people who have been offered [the vaccine] and have simply rejected it,” Salvador Illa told La Sexta TV channel, adding that the list will be shared with “European partners.”
Quote:It is not a document that will be made public and it will be done with the utmost respect for data protection.
Illa explained that the list would help to avoid confusion over why some people had not been vaccinated.
Spain officially launched its immunization campaign on Sunday using the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
Illa said the shots will be administered in accordance with “priorities” laid out by the country’s vaccination plan. “Citizens will be summoned when their turn comes, and what we are asking is – when you are summoned, go to the appointment,” the minister stated, stressing that getting a shot is strictly “voluntary, not mandatory.”
The EFE news agency reported on Tuesday that more than 350,000 doses of the vaccine were delivered to the nation’s major cities, from where they will be distributed across the country.
Mass vaccinations began across the EU over the weekend, shortly after the bloc’s drug regulator approved the Pfizer vaccine and weeks after nationwide vaccinations started in the UK.

Read More: Spain to keep list of people who refuse Covid-19 vaccination & share data with ‘European partners’— health minister
#10
Oxford/AstraZeneca ‘Covid-19′ DNA-manipulating vaccine given untested ’emergency approval’ by UK Big Pharma-dominated agency for mass rollout (Did anyone ever think it wouldn’t be??)

A Covid-19 vaccine from Oxford University and AstraZeneca has been approved for use in the UK, paving the way for mass rollout.
The jab, which has been described as a “game changer”, was given the green light by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
The UK has ordered 100 million doses of the vaccine – enough to vaccinate 50 million people.
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said: “The Government has today accepted the recommendation from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) to authorise Oxford University/AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 vaccine for use.
“This follows rigorous clinical trials and a thorough analysis of the data by experts at the MHRA, which has concluded that the vaccine has met its strict standards of safety, quality and effectiveness.”
Data published in The Lancet medical journal in early December showed the vaccine was 62% effective in preventing Covid-19 among a group of 4,440 people given two standard doses of the vaccine when compared with 4,455 people given a placebo drug.

Read More: Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine approved in UK for mass rollout
  
  • 1(current)
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 7
  • Next 


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)